MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388774296 · doi:10.1101/2023.11.14.567101

Implantable nanophotonic neural probes for integrated patterned photostimulation and electrophysiology recording

2023· preprint· en· W4388774296 on OpenAlexafffund
Fu‐Der Chen, Homeira Moradi Chameh, Mandana Movahed, Hannes Wahn, Xin Mu, Peisheng Ding, Tianyuan Xue, John N. Straguzzi, David A. Roszko, Ankita Sharma, Alperen Gövdeli, Youngho Jung, Hongyao Chua, Xianshu Luo, Patrick Lo, Taufik A. Valiante, Wesley D. Sacher, Joyce K. S. Poon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalOntario Brain InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftMax-Planck-GesellschaftNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsOptogeneticsMaterials scienceBiological neural networkNanophotonicsOptoelectronicsNeural engineeringPhotostimulationElectrophysiologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Optogenetics has transformed neuroscience by allowing precise manipulation of neural circuits with light [1–5]. However, a central difficulty has been to deliver spatially shaped light and record deep within the brain without causing damage or significant heating. Current approaches form the light beam in free space and record the neural activity using fluorescence imaging or separately inserted electrodes [6–9], but attenuation limits optical penetration to around 1 mm of the brain surface [10]. Here, we overcome this challenge with foundry-fabricated implantable silicon neural probes that combine microelectrodes for electrophysiology recordings with nanophotonic circuits that emit light with engineered beam profiles and minimal thermal impact. Our experiments reveal that planar light sheets, emitted by our neural probes, excited more neurons and induced greater firing rate fatigue in layers V and VI of the motor and somatosensory cortex of Thy1-ChR2 mice at lower output intensities than low divergence beams. In the hippocampus of an epilepsy mouse model, we induced seizures, a network-wide response, with light sheets without exceeding the ∼ 1 ◦ C limit for thermally induced electrophysiological responses [11–13]. These findings show that optical spatial profiles can be tailored for optogenetic stimulation paradigms and that the probes can photostimulate and record neural activity at single or population levels while minimizing thermal damage to brain tissue. The neural probes, made in a commercial silicon photonics foundry on 200-mm silicon wafers, demonstrate the manufacturability of the technology. The prospect of monolithically integrating additional well-established silicon photonics devices, such as wavelength and polarization multiplexers, temperature sensors, and optical power monitors, into the probes holds the potential of realizing more versatile, implantable tools for multimodal brain activity mapping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207