Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ideas that fertilized this book began in 2015 during my installation as the John Courtney Murray Chair in Public Service.At that time I invited His Eminence Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, to participate and be part of an unprecedented colloquium with prominent Latinx theologians titled "The Preferential Option for Culture in Latino/a Theology."During my diplomatic service as US Ambassador to the Holy See (2009-12) I had the opportunity to meet and engage many members of the Roman Curia and meet a number of prominent international theological voices.Among all those I met, I held Cardinal Ravasi in high regard as someone who stood out in Rome as a man of faith with broad intellectual depth, and great openness to engage in dialogue within and outside of the Roman Catholic Church.His groundbreaking initiative, "The Courtyard of the Gentiles, " exemplifies these three personal characteristics.My gratitude for this book begins with recognizing Cardinal Ravasi, his contribution to the success of our colloquium, and his willingness to write the foreword to this book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.339 | 0.228 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".