MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388783564 · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2023)104

Worldsheet description of a massive type IIA superstring in 10D

2023· article· en· W4388783564 on OpenAlexafffund
M.P. García del Moral, P. León, A. Restuccia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesMinisterio de Educación, Gobierno de ChileInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloIndustry CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsWorldsheetSuperstring theorySupergravityBraneModuliBrane cosmologyMathematical physicsModuli spaceCosmological constantD-braneString theoryTheoretical physicsSupersymmetryString field theoryQuantum mechanicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We construct, following [1, 2], a massive M2-brane (supermembrane) as the limit of a genus two M2-brane that becomes a twice punctured Riemann surface with particular boundary conditions on the fields defined on the punctures. The target space is M9 × LCD, where LCD is a genus one light cone diagram. It contains mass terms and a topological term associated with the non-triviality of the target surface that, at low energies, can be associated with the presence of a cosmological constant. We show that the supergravity background of the M2-brane considered in this formulation requires the presence of M9-branes acting as sources. They correspond to the 11D uplift of the characteristic D8’s of Romans supergravity. To this end, we explicitly show that some of the background singularities of the massive M2-brane can be reproduced by the M9-branes found by [3]. This establishes a relation between the Romans mass and the moduli of the massive M2-brane. When dimensionally reduced, we obtain a worldsheet Hamiltonian of a N=2 type IIA closed superstring in 10D. We denote it massive string. The corresponding massive string inherits a non-vanishing constant term from the topological massive M2-brane that shifts the Hamiltonian. The non-vanishing parameter is related to the non-trivial structure of the massive M2-brane background and it can be related to the Romans mass term. It also contains a modified tension due to the non-trivial dependence on the moduli and on the punctures associated with the target torus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy Physics→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→