Le génie végétal pour la protection des berges de cours d'eau au Québec : état des lieux et perspectives pour les Basses-terres du Saint-Laurent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ecological engineering techniques for stabilizing stream banks are still not widely used in Quebec. As alternatives to civil engineering, they offer many structural, environmental and recreational benefits. So how can we explain this obstacle and encourage the development of these techniques? This article reviews the specific Quebec context, provides knowledge on existing plant engineering structures and presents initial experimental results. / Les techniques de génie végétal pour la stabilisation des berges de cours d'eau restent encore peu utilisées au Québec. Alternatives au génie civil, elles offrent pourtant de nombreux avantages structurels, environnementaux et récréatifs. Alors comment expliquer ce frein et favoriser le développement de ces techniques ? Cet article fait un point sur le contexte spécifique québécois,apporte des connaissances sur les ouvrages de génie végétal existants et présente des premiers résultats d'expérimentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".