Accessory Extensor Pollicis Longus Tendon Classification Modification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supernumerary extensor pollicis longus (EPL) and extensor indicis proprius tendons are infrequently reported. There are few case reports on more than one accessory tendon in one individual. As a result, they are not represented in previously described classifications for variations in extensors to the thumb. Elective surgery was performed on a 57-year-old right-handed female. Within the fourth compartment, two anomalous accessory tendons were present. These tendons were identified as an accessory EPL tendon and an accessory extensor indicis proprius tendon. The normal EPL tendon occupied the third compartment ulnar to Lister's tubercle, as usual. The previous classification system for anomalous EPL tendons is useful in the organization and description of thumb extensor tendon variations. However, it is not a complete representation of the anomalies identified, including the one in this report. We have proposed an additional category for this classification system to better encompass the variation in anomalous tendon anatomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".