MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388792484 · doi:10.47820/recima21.v4i11.4314

SERVIÇOS DE STREAMING: HISTÓRICO, CONSUMO E PERSPECTIVAS

2023· article· pt· W4388792484 on OpenAlexaff
Arthur Freitas Oliveira, P. Pinheiro, Júlio Afonso Alves Dutra

Bibliographic record

VenueRECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218 · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os serviços de streaming modificaram a maneira como as pessoas passaram a consumir filmes, séries e conteúdo audiovisual, gerando um grande impacto na indústria, originalmente dominada pelo cinema e pela televisão. É apresentado o histórico dos serviços de streaming e como este tipo de serviço vem crescendo na atualidade, impulsionado pelo período da Pandemia Covid-19, onde as pessoas tiveram de se isolar em seus domicílios, utilizando estes serviços como acesso ao conteúdo audiovisual dadas as imposições de isolamento. Apresentam-se os fatores que levam ao consumo deste tipo de serviço e os dados do cenário atual nas diferentes plataformas, sendo para isso desenvolvido um estudo bibliográfico acerca de como os brasileiros preferem consumir os serviços de streaming, quais plataformas são mais relevantes e quais as perspectivas do serviço. Vislumbrou-se que 43% dos brasileiros atualmente possuem o hábito diário de consumo de serviços de streamings e que com a crescente concorrência dos serviços disponíveis, as empresas devem buscar novas estratégias para manterem seus serviços atrativos, priorizando serviços de qualidade com um custo acessível.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218Same topicHealthcare during COVID-19 PandemicFrench-language works237,207