Multispectral multibeam backscatter response of heterogeneous rhodolith beds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acoustic backscatter has been used as a tool to map the seafloor in greater detail and plays an increasingly important role in seafloor mapping to meet multiple ocean management needs. An outstanding challenge to the use of backscatter for seafloor mapping is the distinction between acoustically similar substrates, such as mixed sediments from rhodoliths. Rhodolith beds are a biogenic substrate that provides important ecological services, and are typically classified as a single categorical substrate type-though nodules coverage may be spatially variable. Recently, multispectral acoustic backscatter has demonstrated great potential to improve thematic seafloor mapping compared to single-frequency systems. This work employs multispectral multibeam backscatter and underwater imagery to characterize and map rhodolith beds in the Costa das Algas Marine Protected Area (Brazil). A support vector machine classifier was used to classify multifrequency backscatter mosaics according to rhodolith classes identified from underwater imagery. Results suggest that multispectral backscatter is effective both in providing information for mapping different proportions of rhodolith coverage and in predicting the presence or absence of these nodules. The backscatter of the lowest frequency was the most useful for distinguishing variable proportions of rhodolith coverage, and the two higher frequencies were better predictors of presence and absence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".