La eficacia de los derechos humanos a través del enfoque de la economía social y solidaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analizar la relación entre la concepción de los derechos humanos y la llamada “otra forma de hacer economía” permite avizorar una perspectiva fundamental de la economía social y solidaria, la cual cobra cada vez más relevancia en contextos de crisis como el actual derivado de la pandemia por COVID-19 y en países con ordenamientos jurídicos en los cuales los derechos humanos son el eje central de todo su sistema; una particularidad cada vez más presente en diferentes naciones, sobre todo cuando la satisfacción de varios de estos derechos sigue siendo una tarea pendiente e incompatible, aparentemente, con el sistema económico hegemónico. Esta investigación demuestra cómo prácticas exitosas de Economía Social y Solidaria conllevan una salvaguarda de derechos humanos y fomentan el desarrollo humano local a partir de un factor de inclusión e integración social propio de los valores y principios de la Economía Social y Solidaria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".