MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388796330 · doi:10.1101/2023.11.17.567544

Efficient and sustained optogenetic control of sensory and cardiac systems

2023· preprint· en· W4388796330 on OpenAlexaff
Alexey Alekseev, Victoria Hunniford, Maria Zerche, Marcus Jeschke, Fadhel El May, Anna Vavakou, Dominique Siegenthaler, Marc A. Hüser, Svenja M Kiehn, Aida Garrido‐Charles, Alexander Meyer, Adrian Rambousky, Theocharis Alvanos, Isabel Witzke, Keila Dara Rojas-García, Martin D Draband, Lukas Cyganek, Eric Klein, Patrick Ruther, Antoine Huet, Stuart Trenholm, Émilie Macé, Kathrin Kusch, Tobias Bruegmann, Bettina Wolf, Thomas Mager, Tobias Moser

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftStudienstiftung des Deutschen VolkesFondation Pour l'AuditionEuropean CommissionAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOptogeneticsNeuroscienceControl (management)Computer scienceBiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Optogenetic control is used to manipulate the activity of specific cell types in vivo for a variety of biological and clinical applications. Here we report ChReef, an improved variant of the channelrhodopsin ChRmine. ChReef offers minimal photocurrent desensitization, a unitary conductance of 80 fS and closing kinetics of 30 ms, which together enable reliable optogenetic control of cells at low light levels with good temporal fidelity and sustained stimulation. We demonstrate efficient and reliable red-light pacing and depolarization-block of ChReef-expressing cardiomyocyte clusters. We used AAV-based gene transfer to express ChReef in retinal ganglion cells, where it restores visual function in blind mice with light sources as weak as an iPad screen. Toward optogenetic hearing restoration, ChReef enables stimulation of the auditory pathway in rodents and non-human primates with nano-Joule threshold, enabling efficient and frequency-specific stimulation by LED-based optical cochlear implants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207