Is post-hypertonic lysis of human red blood cells caused by excessive cell volume regulation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human red blood cells (RBC) exposed to hypertonic media are subject to post-hypertonic lysis - an injury that only develops during resuspension to an isotonic medium. The nature of post-hypertonic lysis was previously hypothesized to be osmotic when cation leaks were observed, and salt loading was suggested as a cause of the cell swelling upon resuspension in an isotonic medium. However, it was problematic to account for the salt loading since the plasma membrane of human RBCs was considered impermeable to cations. In this study, the hypertonicity-related behavior of human RBCs is revisited within the framework of modern cell physiology, considering current knowledge on membrane ion transport mechanisms - an account still missing. It is recognized here that the hypertonic behavior of human RBCs is consistent with the acute regulatory volume increase (RVI) response - a healthy physiological reaction initiated by cells to regulate their volume by salt accumulation. It is shown by reviewing the published studies that human RBCs can increase cation conductance considerably by activating cell volume-regulated ion transport pathways inactive under normal isotonic conditions and thus facilitate salt loading. A simplified physiological model accounting for transmembrane ion fluxes and membrane voltage predicts the isotonic cell swelling associated with increased cation conductance, eventually reaching hemolytic volume. The proposed involvement of cell volume regulation mechanisms shows the potential to explain the complex nature of the osmotic response of human RBCs and other cells. Cryobiological implications, including mechanisms of cryoprotection, are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".