MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388811644 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2023.a912322

The Diaries of Anthony Hewitson, Provincial Journalist, Volume 1, 1865–1887 by Andrew Hobbs (review)

2023· article· en· W4388811644 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Leary

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperMemoirJournalismHistoryArt historyMedia studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Diaries of Anthony Hewitson, Provincial Journalist, Volume 1, 1865–1887 by Andrew Hobbs Patrick Leary (bio) Andrew Hobbs, The Diaries of Anthony Hewitson, Provincial Journalist, Volume 1, 1865–1887 (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2022), pp. viii + 672, $42.95/£35.95 hardcover, $31.00/£25.95 paperback, open-access e-book. A diary by a Victorian newspaper journalist is a rare thing. One might conclude that those whose job it was to gather the public news of the day were not typically much inclined to keep a record of their own personal doings. Memoirs there are in plenty, but as a guide to actual journalistic practice, they generally lack both detail and candor. A diary by a journalist based outside of London is even rarer. In fact, there is only one such document known to scholars, and until now one had to travel to the Lancashire Archives in Preston to see it. So it is not surprising that a historian as astute as Andrew Hobbs quickly grasped the significance of the unpublished manuscript diaries of Anthony Hewitson (1836–1912), a journalist based in Preston. Hewitson's diaries deeply inform Hobbs's landmark study of provincial journalism, A Fleet Street in Every Town: The Provincial Press in England, 1855–1900 (2018). This edition of the 1865–87 diaries, soon to be followed by a second and concluding volume covering 1891 to 1912, is a gift to all students of Victorian journalism and, for that matter, of Victorian culture more generally. Starting his working life as an apprentice to a printer, Hewitson provides a particularly useful example of just how common, for much of the century, was the progression from compositor to reporter to subeditor to editor and even to proprietor. This kind of fluidity would become less frequent later, but Hewitson's case demonstrates how seamlessly many members of the "labour aristocracy" of the printing trade were able to move [End Page 308] among various other roles in the production of books, magazines, and newspapers. Printers, reporters, and editors all shared a similar class position, and the last two jobs were frequently held at the same time. A newspaper proprietor, however, had much clearer claims to solid middle-class status. After years of working as the chief reporter for Preston's largest newspaper, the Preston Guardian, Hewitson bought the town's third largest paper, the Preston Chronicle, in 1868. Yet even as proprietor, Hewitson spent much of his time working at the same sorts of things he had worked at in his earlier career while also spending his Saturdays selling copies of his paper, collecting tuppences from behind the counter of his own newspaper office. These are not the kind of diaries meant to be read for their literary merits. There are no passages of fine writing, no particularly striking descriptions of the people, places, or events that Hewitson encountered. He saved all that sort of thing for his columns and guidebooks and local histories. These are the working diaries of a busy provincial journalist, and their effect on the reader as well as their value to the historian lies in their cumulative impact, a steady accretion of quotidian detail that illuminates, as nothing else can, the working life of a Victorian journalist and editor. The rhythms of Hewitson's working life as reflected in these detailed diary entries are revelatory in many ways, not least of which is how thoroughly his work as a journalist was permeated by oral culture. Indeed, his ability to record speech accurately, via shorthand, was the early accomplishment that most fully enabled his move from printer to reporter. The diaries make clear how much his success depended upon the countless bits of gossip that he picked up as he roamed the town in his constant search for "pars" to fill the paper (38). "Running about after paragraphs," runs one entry in 1865, a remark that in one form or another crops up repeatedly through all of the diary's six hundred pages (25). One example must suffice. On June 7, 1872, Hewitson gets wind of a juicy bit of gossip about the seventy-four-year-old local vicar, who, it is whispered...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207