MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388819621 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2023.3334203

Experimental Demonstration of the Incident Field Reconstruction Method for Metasurface Characterization

2023· article· en· W4388819621 on OpenAlexaff
Kuozhan Wang, T. Smy, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperposition principleExcitationHorn antennaOpticsAntenna (radio)Near and far fieldFrench hornPlane wavePhysicsRadiation patternField (mathematics)GaussianAcousticsSlot antennaComputer scienceTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple method to characterize metasurfaces (MSs) using an incident field reconstruction (IFR) method is experimentally demonstrated in theKa-band, following the theoretical analysis presented in (Tiukuvaara et al., 2022). The IFR method is based on reconstructing desired incident field profiles using a linear superposition of base field profiles, such as Gaussian beams or practical horn antenna structures. The IFR method is applied here to determine the scattered fields of an MS corresponding to a uniform plane wave (PW) excitation, and an excellent agreement with an ideal PW excitation is demonstrated here, with a significant improvement compared with conventionally used single horn antenna excitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207