MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388820109 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2023.3334207

Six-Step Operation With Multistep Predictive Control Using the Trapezoidal Method for Traction PMSM Drives

2023· article· en· W4388820109 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyao Sun, Guanzhou Ren, Shuai Xu, Guangtong Ma, Juri Jatskevich

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Sichuan ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)CommutationModel predictive controlTraction (geology)OvermodulationDiscretizationEngineeringComputer scienceControl engineeringMathematicsVoltageControl (management)Pulse-width modulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model predictive control (MPC) has recently been considered for many permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive applications. However, the conventional MPC presents insufficient overmodulation capability and, thus, cannot reach the six-step operation, which limits its application in the traction drive areas. This article proposes a novel MPC-based six-step operation scheme for the PMSM drive in traction applications. The prediction horizon is extended to the whole commutation period of the six-step operation, and a new average current-based objective function is introduced to determine the optimal commutation instants. To enhance the method's precision, a trapezoidal discretization method has been adopted in the long-horizon prediction. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been validated by detailed studies. The proposed method is demonstrated to have excellent current-tracking accuracy and fast dynamic response in the six-step operation, which is an advantage over the existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207