Performance Evaluation of Fiber Near-Infrared (NIR) Optic Probes for Quality Control of Curd Hardness in Cheese Produced by Spray-Dried Milk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to provide the dairy industry with a direct control model focused on milk coagulation by using multifiber probes to determine parameters in the curding process, such as cutting time, at a lower cost. The main objective of the research is to confirm that a multifiber NIR light scattering probe can be used to predict the elastic modulus of curd during milk coagulation in cheese production. Two randomized complete block designs were used with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement of three protein levels (3%, 3.5% and 4%) and three wavelengths (870 nm, 880 nm and 890 nm). Using a multifiber probe at a wavelength of 880 nm allowed obtaining a better optical response of the sensor during enzymatic milk coagulation than the 870 nm. It showed greater sensitivity to variations in the protein content of the milk and lower variation in the response. The multifiber probe at a wavelength of 880 nm generated a NIR light backscatter profile like those obtained with other systems. The results showed that the prediction model parameters had a variation as a function of the protein content, which opens the possibility of improving the prediction model’s performance substantially. Furthermore, the initial voltage obtained with the probe responded linearly to the different protein levels in milk. This fact would make it possible, at least theoretically, to estimate protein concentration with the same inline probe for G’ determination, facilitating the incorporation of a corrective protein factor in the prediction models using a single instrument.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".