MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388826017 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02723

Speciation and Phase Equilibria of Aqueous Boric Acid and Alkali Metal Borates from Ambient to Hydrothermal Conditions: A Comprehensive Thermodynamic Model

2023· article· en· W4388826017 on OpenAlexafffund
Peiming Wang, Andrzej Anderko, Peter R. Tremaine

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaElectric Power Research Institute
KeywordsBoric acidAlkali metalBoronSolubilityChemistryInorganic chemistryElectrolyteAqueous solutionGibbs free energyThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the needs for thermodynamic simulation of nuclear power reactor chemistry, geothermal fluid chemistry, and critical materials (Li, B) recovery processes from brines, a comprehensive model has been developed for simultaneous phase equilibrium and speciation calculations. The new model extends a previously developed model for boric acid and selected borates (Wang, P.; Kosinski, J., J.; Lencka, M., M.; Anderko, A.; Springer, R., D. Thermodynamic modeling of boric acid and selected metal borate systems. Pure & Applied Chemistry, 2013, 85, 2117) by utilizing detailed speciation results from recent electrical conductivity measurements in dilute solutions of boric acid and alkali metal borates and quantitative Raman spectroscopic studies at moderate concentrations. For this purpose, the Mixed-Solvent Electrolyte (MSE) framework has been adopted and parametrized for systems containing boric acid, lithium borate, sodium borate, and potassium borate by incorporating the new speciation data together with vapor–liquid equilibrium and solid solubility data. The MSE model combines a treatment of standard-state properties of simple and complex aqueous species with an excess Gibbs energy model that is valid up to solid–liquid saturation or the fused electrolyte limit. This approach ensures the correct prediction of the formation of experimentally identified polyborate species, while reproducing extensive experimental solubility and vapor–liquid equilibrium data. The model has been validated for the B 2 O 3 + H 2 O, Li 2 O + B 2 O 3 + H 2 O, Na 2 O + B 2 O 3 + H 2 O, and K 2 O + B 2 O 3 + H 2 O systems at temperatures up to 623 K at widely varying alkali metal/boron ratios. In particular, the model aligns with the new experimental speciation results to provide reliable predictions under the conditions of pressurized water reactors for nuclear power generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207