A Novel Approach for the Early Detection of Medical Resource Demand Surges During Health Care Emergencies: Infodemiology Study of Tweets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted gaps in the current handling of medical resource demand surges and the need for prioritizing scarce medical resources to mitigate the risk of health care facilities becoming overwhelmed. OBJECTIVE: During a health care emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the public often uses social media to express negative sentiment (eg, urgency, fear, and frustration) as a real-time response to the evolving crisis. The sentiment expressed in COVID-19 posts may provide valuable real-time information about the relative severity of medical resource demand in different regions of a country. In this study, Twitter (subsequently rebranded as X) sentiment analysis was used to investigate whether an increase in negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets corresponded to a greater demand for hospital intensive care unit (ICU) beds in specific regions of the United States, Brazil, and India. METHODS: Tweets were collected from a publicly available data set containing COVID-19 tweets with sentiment labels and geolocation information posted between February 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Regional medical resource shortage data were gathered from publicly available data sets reporting a time series of ICU bed demand across each country. Negative sentiment tweets were analyzed using the Granger causality test and convergent cross-mapping (CCM) analysis to assess the utility of the time series of negative sentiment tweets in forecasting ICU bed shortages. RESULTS: For the United States (30,742,934 negative sentiment tweets), the results of the Granger causality test (for whether negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets forecast ICU bed shortage, assuming a stochastic system) were significant (P<.05) for 14 (28%) of the 50 states that passed the augmented Dickey-Fuller test at lag 2, and the results of the CCM analysis (for whether negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets forecast ICU bed shortage, assuming a dynamic system) were significant (P<.05) for 46 (92%) of the 50 states. For Brazil (3,004,039 negative sentiment tweets), the results of the Granger causality test were significant (P<.05) for 6 (22%) of the 27 federative units, and the results of the CCM analysis were significant (P<.05) for 26 (96%) of the 27 federative units. For India (4,199,151 negative sentiment tweets), the results of the Granger causality test were significant (P<.05) for 6 (23%) of the 26 included regions (25 states and the national capital region of Delhi), and the results of the CCM analysis were significant (P<.05) for 26 (100%) of the 26 included regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a novel approach for identifying the regions of high hospital bed demand during a health care emergency scenario by analyzing Twitter sentiment data. Leveraging analyses that take advantage of natural language processing-driven tweet extraction systems has the potential to be an effective method for the early detection of medical resource demand surges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".