A Recreation Mechanism for Refugee Memories to Get through the Betrayal and Trauma in The Hungry Tides by Amitav Ghosh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mental stress is an inevitable part in the life of a refugee, especially when they have to struggle through many political oppression, war, and migration. Refugees are the individuals who are forced to leave their land because of extremely disturbing external factors. Refugees go through all the struggles in the hope of having a better life, which they may not have in their homeland. This would lead to mental and physical torture as they have to go through traumatic experiences while being an immigrant like loss of property, livelihood, malnutrition, identity crisis etc. The way of recalling the past events through one's perspective is memory. Memory is also a way of remembering the painful past, which could be the cause of preventing oneself from healing the trauma. This research will look at how memory or recalling the past is used as a tool to understand the mental stress of the refugees. This research will analyse the novel “The Hungry Tides'' by Amitav Ghosh to see the use of memory and will also try to understand whether recalling painful events is a way to cope with the past and how the memory of a person can be manipulated to manage past trauma. Through textual analysis of the novel, the researcher uses the theory of betrayal trauma and the Pavilion method of fear extinction to help in understanding the usage of memory to change the trauma of a person. The article will show how memory can be manipulated by forgetting and recreating the events in a way so that the refugees can be relieved from their stressful situations and traumatic events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".