Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the background of China’s educational equity and the problems and solutions of Chinese school education. Using the method of literature review, the research results of scholars at home and abroad are integrated, and the field is systematically sorted out and analyzed. The study found that the problems faced by Chinese education mainly include the inequality of regional education development and the inequality of urban and rural education. There are differences in the allocation of educational resources in different regions, resulting in insufficient education quality and opportunities in some regions, which in turn exacerbates the problem of educational inequality. Secondly, the inequality of urban and rural education is also a major problem of education fairness in our China. Due to the uneven distribution of urban and rural economic development and resources, rural education conditions are relatively poor, and students have limited learning opportunities and resources, resulting in a widening urban-rural education gap. country place. In response to these problems, this study proposes solutions to deepen reform and promote educational equity. Through literature review and analysis of the problems existing in our Chinese education, put forward corresponding solutions, and make corresponding efforts to promote educational equity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".