Implementation of Digital Twin in Actual Production: Intelligent Assembly Paradigm for Large-Scale Industrial Equipment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The assembly process of large-scale and non-standard industrial equipment poses significant challenges due to its inherent scale-related complexity and proneness to errors, making it difficult to ensure process cost, production cycle, and assembly accuracy. In response to the limitations of traditional ineffective production models, this paper aims to explore and propose a digital twin (DT)-based technology paradigm for the intelligent assembly of large-scale and non-standard industrial equipment, focusing on both the equipment structure and assembly process levels. The paradigm incorporates key technologies that facilitate the integration of virtual and physical information, including the establishment and updating of DT models for assembly structures using actual data, the assessment of structural assemblability based on DT models, the planning and simulation of assembly processes, and the implementation of virtual commissioning technology tailored to the actual assembly process. The effectiveness of the proposed paradigm is demonstrated through a case study involving the actual assembly of a large-scale aerodynamic experimental equipment. The results confirm its ability to provide valuable technical support for the design, evaluation, and optimization of industrial equipment assembly processes. By leveraging the DT-based methodological system proposed in this paper, significant improvements in the transparency and intelligence of industrial equipment production processes can be achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it