ANALISIS KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP SISTEM PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE PADA MASA PANDEMIC COVID 19 DI STMIK AKAKOM DENGAN METODE NAIVE BAYES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In accordance with the circular of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia regarding Circular Letter Number 4 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Educational Policies in the Emergency Period for the Spread of Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19), the learning system implemented is online. 
 STMIK AKAKOM is one of the universities that has also implemented online lectures since the government's policy for the home learning system was established. Various efforts have been made by STMIK AKAKOM to carry out the online learning process during this covid-19 pandemic. 
 Therefore, researchers conducted a study that aims to analyze the success of the online learning system for students conducted at STMIK AKAKOM with the Naive Bayes method approach, using 4 (four) criteria, namely Communication, Building a Learning Atmosphere, Assessment of Students, and Delivery of Lecture Materials. The level of satisfaction assessment using a Likert scale (likert scale) 5 points with the same interval. starting from point 1 (one) which states very less, to point 5 (five) which states very well. Based on the results of calculations that have been carried out, it can be seen that the classification of testing data from respondents numbered R89 to R93 for online learning systems during the Covid 19 pandemic is satisfied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it