Caregiver Concerns About, and Clinical Characteristics of, Persons Referred to a Specialized Mental Health Service for Those with Intellectual Disabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction As little is known about who uses specialty mental health clinics for persons with intellectual disabilities, this study aimed to identified caregiver concerns, clinical characteristics, and the relationship between these two constructs for referrals to such a clinic.Methods Qualitative and quantitative analyses were applied to data derived from an intake questionnaire of all individuals referred to a specialty clinic in Canada over one year.Results The dataset consisted of 149 persons (55.7% male; 37.6% with autism; mean age: 28.8 years [SD: 13.2]). The two overarching categories of caregiver concerns were about: (1) aspects of clinic service, especially medication questions, and (2) specific emotional, behavioral, and diagnostic concerns, especially regarding emotional states. Caregivers of persons with autism had higher odds of medication concerns, but few other significant relationships were found.Conclusions Further investigations about emotional difficulties and medication concerns, inclusive of perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities, are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".