MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388839832 · doi:10.1080/19315864.2023.2285040

Polyvictimization and Impairments in Functioning for Children and Youth with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

2023· article· en· W4388839832 on OpenAlexafffund
Shannon L. Stewart, Abigail Withers, Valbona Semovski, Natalia Lapshina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyClinical psychologyCognitionPsychological interventionAggressionIntervention (counseling)Fetal Alcohol Spectrum DisorderPsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with cognitive, emotional, and learning impairments have an increased likelihood of experiencing behavioral and socio-emotional difficulties and historical trauma.Methods Using the interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health instrument, this study examined associations between FASD, polyvictimization, daily cognitive decision-making, family functioning, and externalizing problems in 18,701 children and youth from 4 to 18 years of age (Mage = 12.33, SDage = 3.53).Results Children with FASD, compared to children without FASD, were at an increased risk of being polyvictimized, were more likely to endorse greater difficulties with daily cognitive decision-making and family dysfunction, and scored higher on proactive and reactive aggression.Conclusion The findings highlight the increased risk of individual and familial difficulties in children diagnosed with FASD. The limitations and clinical implications are discussed to inform further research and assist in the development of trauma-informed clinical interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual DisabilitiesSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207