MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wharton’s Jelly Tissue Allograft for Connective Tissue Defects Surrounding Nerves in the Tarsal Tunnel: A Retrospective Case Series

2023· preprint· en· W4388840917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald Bruton, Tracie Gilliland, John Shou, Naomi Lambert, Crislyn Woods, Tyler W. Barrett

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyTarsal tunnel syndromeSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Caused by age or trauma, collapsed connective tissue can cause nerve entrapment and damage within the tarsal tunnel. With an unknown incidence rate, tarsal tunnel syndrome is relatively underdiagnosed, and current literature is inconclusive on best practices for patient care. While most standard treatments involve symptom management, this retrospective case series highlights a novel approach, targeting the damaged tissues surrounding the nerves and replacing the structural cushioning with a Wharton’s jelly tissue allograft. Methods This cohort was selected from the retrospective repository at Regenativelabs. The eight selected patients had tarsal tunnel-related defects from four clinical sites. Patient outcomes were tracked on a 90-day calendar utilizing the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC). All patients had failed standard care practices for at least six weeks. Each patient received one 2mL application of 150mg minimally manipulated Wharton’s jelly tissue allograft to strategic sites around the affected tarsal tunnel. No patients experienced adverse reactions. Red light and laser therapies were recommended post-application. Results The percent change of improvement in patient pain scales was calculated with the cohort averages at initial application, 30-day follow-up, and 90-day follow-up appointments. All patients reported decreased pain on both scales. Percent change calculated from the initial application to the 90-day follow-up showed an improvement of 59.43% in NPRS and a 37.58% improvement in WOMAC. Conclusions Given the reported pain improvements on various pain rating scales, this study provides evidence that WJ allograft applications are safe, minimally invasive, and efficacious for patients who have failed standard care treatments for connective tissue defects associated with Tarsal Tunnel syndrome. The results of this study warrant further research to confirm the efficacy of Wharton's jelly added to conservative care protocols to clarify WJ allograft application's optimal dose, protocol, and durability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207