Bibliographic record
Abstract
The history of policing of First Nations in Canada is one of domination and control. Since the time of first contact, First Nations communities in Canada have had colonial systems of policing and justice imposed upon them. It is only in the past 40 years that many First Nations communities have begun to take back that control, to decide how they want to provide law enforcement and crime control services to their communities through their own police services. Mohawk Chief Peacekeeper Dwayne Zacharie provides an overview of First Nations Policing and the difficulties inherent to its designation as a program, and not as an essential service. These include not only fiscal challenges, but also the need for a greater recognition of the important role that Kahnawá:ke Peacekeepers play in their community and the larger community, off reserve. Chief Zacharie underscores how First Nations Policing is community policing in the truest sense, given that most Peacekeepers live and work in their own community, know the members of the community through the relationships they develop and actively engage the community in decision-making and self-determination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".