Statistical Methods for Microrheology of Airway Mucus with Extreme Heterogeneity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mucus lining of the human airway epithelium contains two gel-forming mucins, MUC5B and MUC5AC. During progression of cystic fibrosis (CF), mucus hyper-concentrates as its mucin ratio changes, coinciding with formation of insoluble, dense mucus flakes. We explore rheological heterogeneity of this pathology with reconstituted mucus matching three stages of CF progression and particle-tracking of 200 nm and 1 micron diameter beads. We introduce statistical data analysis methods specific to low signal-to-noise data within flakes. Each bead time series is decomposed into: (i) a fractional Brownian motion (fBm) classifier of the pure time-series signal ; (ii) high-frequency static and dynamic noise; and (iii) low-frequency deterministic drift. Subsequent analysis focuses on the denoised fBm classifier ensemble from each mucus sample and bead diameter. Every ensemble fails a homogeneity test, compelling clustering methods to assess levels of heterogeneity. The first binary level detects beads within vs. outside flakes. A second binary level detects within-flake bead signals that can vs. cannot be disentangled from the experimental noise floor. We show all denoised ensembles, within- and outside-flakes, fail a homogeneity test, compelling additional clustering; next, all clusters with sufficient data fail a homogeneity test. These levels of heterogeneity are consistent with outcomes from a stochastic phase-separation process, and dictate applying the generalized Stokes-Einstein relation to each bead per cluster per sample, then frequency-domain averaging to assess rheological heterogeneity. Flakes exhibit a spectrum of gel-like and sol-like domains, outside-flake solutions a spectrum of sol-like domains, painting a rheological signature of the phase-separation process underlying flake-burdened mucus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".