Enhanced DFT-Based Chaotic Image Block Cipher with Several Modes of Operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chaotic image encryption has been investigated extensively in the literature in different domains, including the frequency domain using Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT). Despite DFT-based chaotic image cryptosystems exhibiting good confusion properties, they suffer from poor diffusion characteristics and non-uniform histograms. Therefore, they are vulnerable to many attacks, such as differential attacks, and statistical cryptanalytic attacks. This paper presents an enhanced block cipher image cryptosystem with several modes of operation based on the concept of bit reversal using the 2D chaotic Baker map and DFT. The proposed enhancement develops an improved image encryption scheme that involves properly diffusion-confusion enhanced operations within modified versions of the known block cipher modes of operation, namely Cipher Block Chaining Mode (CBC), Cipher Feedback Mode (CFB), and Output Feedback Mode (OFB). These enhanced operations are based on a 2D chaotic baker map in the Fourier domain. The proposed enhancement is validated using a MATLAB simulation. Results show that the proposed work manages to overcome the abovementioned problems outstandingly and outperforms the existing results in the literature in many encryption quality metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".