Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Who Is Transferring What to Whom?” has never been published until now. It was presented in oral delivery at an international conference at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, in 1985. The conference – “On the Transference” – was a unique event in the United States. Lacanian analysts came from many countries to present as featured speakers. Lacan’s editor and successor, Jacques-Alain Miller, presented in North America for a second year in a row, following his first appearance in Canada in 1984. Students of literature, philosophy, art, and psychology, as well as many clinicians, gave papers on the transference. Allan Bass, a Derridean commentator, presented a Derridean theory of transference, as did Samuel Weber. Well-known philosophers and theologians who had studied Lacan (such as Wilfried ver Ecke, William Richardson, and others) were featured speakers as well. The tone and intellectual atmosphere of the debate was one of intense curiosity on the part of those hearing the theory and mode of praxis of Italian, French, Latin American, and Israeli Lacanian analysts. There was an awareness among featured speakers and student presenters that something new and different was in the air and that it concerned a redefinition of knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".