Vascular synthesis based on hemodynamic efficiency principle recapitulates measured cerebral circulation properties in the human brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantifying anatomical and hemodynamical properties of the brain vasculature in vivo is difficult due to limited spatiotemporal resolution neuroimaging, variability between subjects, and bias between acquisition techniques. This work introduces a metabolically inspired vascular synthesis algorithm for creating a digital representation of the cortical blood supply in humans. Spatial organization and segment resistances of a cortical vascular network were generated. Cortical folding and macroscale arterial and venous vessels were reconstructed from anatomical MRI and MR angiography. The remaining network, including ensembles representing the parenchymal capillary bed, were synthesized following a mechanistic principle based on hydrodynamic efficiency of the cortical blood supply. We evaluated the digital model by comparing its simulated values with in vivo healthy human brain measurements of macrovessel blood velocity from phase contrast MRI and capillary bed transit times and bolus arrival times from dynamic susceptibility contrast. We find that measured and simulated values reasonably agree and that relevant neuroimaging observables can be recapitulated in silico. This work provides a basis for describing and testing quantitative aspects of the cerebrovascular circulation that are not directly observable. Future applications of such digital brains include the investigation of the organ-wide effects of simulated vascular and metabolic pathologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".