Land-Use Regression Analysis of Summer Tropospheric Ozone Concentrations in Ireland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tropospheric ozone is a powerful oxidant that can damage living organisms; it is widely monitored, as air concentrations have more than doubled since the Industrial Revolution. However, in general air quality monitoring stations are limited spatially to large urban centres; accordingly, accurate prediction of concentrations outside of cities is important for protecting human and plant health. Land-use regression has been successfully used for modelling air pollutant concentrations by establishing a relationship between observed concentrations and landscape features representing sources and sinks. In this study, we developed a land-use regression model that explained 68% of the variance of summer average ozone concentrations in the Republic of Ireland. Ozone was measured at 14 active and 20 passive monitoring sites; air concentrations varied spatially, with the highest ozone measured in rural upland (64.5 µg/m3) and Atlantic coastal (50.2–60.5 µg/m3) sites and the lowest generally in urban centres (38.9–45.7 µg/m3). A total of 74 land-use predictor variables were tested, and their inclusion in the model was based on their impact on the coefficient of determination (R2). The final model included variables linked primarily to deposition processes and included “forest woodland and scrub area” and “distance to coast”. The meteorological variable “rain” and an indicator for NOx emissions “distance to EPA Integrated Pollution Control facilities” were also included in the final model. Our results demonstrate the potential effectiveness of land-use regression modelling in predicting ozone concentrations, at a scale relevant for ecosystem protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".