MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388868366 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.3c02062

Intrinsic Modulation Doping Enhances the Thermoelectric Performance of Monolayer GaGeTe

2023· article· en· W4388868366 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Rafiee Diznab, Yi Xia, S. Shahab Naghavi

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersShahid Beheshti University
KeywordsGermaneneMonolayerThermoelectric effectThermoelectric materialsMaterials scienceDopingCondensed matter physicsElectron mobilityFigure of meritPhononOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyEngineering physicsGraphenePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modulation doping is a well-known approach for improving the efficiency of bulk thermoelectrics, yet its application to 2D materials has remained elusive. Our thorough first-principles calculations reveal a unique intrinsic modulation doping in monolayer GaGeTe that synergistically raises its electrical transport coefficients while dwarfing its lattice heat transport, resulting in a high thermoelectric figure of merit, zT . Herein, we envision 2D GaGeTe as a chair-like germanene monolayer shrouded by two GaTe layers. The germanene layer donates electrons to the outer GaTe, creating a spatial separation between the electron-donation center and charge transport channels, a feature that suppresses free carrier scattering. Our accurate electron–phonon calculations explain that electrical transport in GaGeTe results from the metallic nature of germanene combined with the Mexican-hat shape of the GaTe valence band. The superior electrical and poor heat transport coefficients turn GaGeTe into a promising p-type thermoelectric monolayer working at moderate carrier concentrations of ≈10 13 cm –2 . The presented results put forward a distinct design approach for identifying competent thermoelectrics among 2D materials whose frail structures cannot tolerate heavy doping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Energy MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207