MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388870314 · doi:10.56369/tsaes.4882

RESPUESTA DE TRES ESPECIES MADERABLES DE RÁPIDO CRECIMIENTO A DIFERENTES BIOCLIMAS EN ECUADOR

2023· article· en· W4388870314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and soil sciences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones AgropecuariasSecretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
KeywordsPaulowniaForestryBiomass (ecology)TropicsHorticultureBiologyBotanyGeographyAgroforestryAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><strong>Background:</strong> The timber sector in Ecuador holds promising potential for growth and development. The intensive utilization of native taxa has depleted their genetic species pool, making them increasingly scarce in meeting the rising demand for wood. Consequently, there has been a growing exploration of new fast-growing forest species to serve as alternatives for lumber and biomass production. <strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the suitability of Andean bioclimatic conditions for the introduction of three tree species: <em>Paulownia elongata, P. fortunei</em>, and the hybrid <em>P. elongata x P. fortunei</em>. This work primarily focused in investigating whether plant density impacts the initial growth of individual tree growth and whether there is a co-dependence between site conditions and plant density in each of the three species. <strong>Methodology:</strong> The National Autonomous Institute of Farming Research (INIAP) imported 3000 seedlings, each about 10cm tall, of <em>Paulownia e</em>longata, <em>Paulownia fortunei</em>, and the hybrid <em>Paulownia elongata</em> x <em>Paulownia fortunei</em> from the World Paulownia Institute of Georgia - USA. Four experimental sites were selected in two regions of Ecuador: humid tropics (Quevedo and Santo Domingo de los Tsachilas), dry sub-peak (el Almendral) and Andes (Riobamba), each site is located at different altitudes. At each site, the experiment was set up in a spatial split-plot arrangement with randomized complete blocks. Three blocks were established, two planting frames (3x3 m and 4x4 m) and the three selected <em>Paulownia</em> species. The three blocks were laid off randomly in each experiment. The two planting frames were randomly placed within each block, and the three species were randomly planted within each planting frame. The experimental subjects (plant species) consisted of nine individuals. <strong>Results:</strong> Plants with higher height and diameter are located in areas with lower elevation, with hybrid Paulownia displaying better performance in high densities. All species showed a survival rate above 85% one-year post-establishment. However, the lowest survival is found in areas above 2000 m. <strong>Implications:</strong> High elevations restrict the individual growth of Paulownia in Andean conditions, but low altitudes enhance it. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The three specimens performed reasonably well during one-year post-establishment. However, it is necessary to continue observing their growth until they reach their asymptotic point, determining their volumetric yield.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it