MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Delay-Optimal Cooperative Vehicle-Infrastructure Computing with IRS-Enhanced Secure Wireless Communications

2023· article· en· W4388872610 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Han, Jianshan Zhou, Daxin Tian, Xuting Duan, Kaige Qu, Pinlong Cai, Dezong Zhao, Zhengguo Sheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsComputer scienceEdge computingMobile edge computingLatency (audio)Scheme (mathematics)Optimization problemWirelessComputer networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionLow latency (capital markets)Joint (building)Distributed computingComputationVehicular ad hoc networkIntelligent transportation systemServerWireless ad hoc networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile edge computing(MEC) addresses the challenges posed by the rapid growth of VANETs in transmitting real-time, reliable, and large amounts of data between vehicles and roadside infrastructure. To ensure information security in MEC-based VANETs, Intelligent Reflective Surface (IRS) technology is considered as a viable solution. By combining the technical advantages of edge computing and IRS, this study proposes a joint optimization problem to achieve a secure, efficient, and low-latency offloading and communication scheme for vehicular and roadside infrastructure computation and communication. The PSO algorithm is employed as the basis for an alternating optimization scheme to solve the proposed joint optimization problem. Numerical simulation analyses demonstrate the significant advantages of the proposed solution in terms of overall system latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207