Layer-to-Layer Thermal History Prediction for Thin Walls in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thermal history has a great effect on the part properties in metal additive manufacturing such as tensile strength and hardness. To study and control the thermal behavior of the AM processes, various data-driven thermal history modeling methods have been developed and tested on simulation data. However, their in-situ application scenarios are rarely explored and discussed. This paper aims to provide a layer-to-layer thermal history prediction model, which enables predicting the thermal history of a yet-to-print layer based on the data measured from the printed lower layers. First, the thermal behavior is analyzed to reveal the similarities in temperature curves of two successive layers. Then four input variables are identified, including the deposition rate, the relative height of the layer, the printing time, and the dwell time of one layer. Based on the selected input variables and the temperature output, a fully connected neural network with residual connection is designed to simplify the training process. Five numerical simulations are designed to collect temperature curves (curve segments of a temperature profile) on each layer, and one experimental study on wire arc additive manufacturing is completed to record the temperature curves. Based on the collected data, three cases are proposed to test the modeling framework, such as (a) dividing all simulation data into the training set and validation set, (b) training the model based on four simulation runs and its validation with the last simulation, and (c) training the model with all simulation data and testing on the experimental data. The former two cases show great prediction accuracies with a relative error of less than 5% in most cases, which indicates its potential in online prediction when trained with data from the same input conditions or same systems. While the applicability of the model trained only with simulation data should be explored further in real experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".