Non-Smooth Reduced Interface Models and Their Use in Co-Simulation of Mechanical Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In a co-simulation setup, the entire system is decomposed into a collection of individual subsystems that are interfaced together, with each subsystem being modelled and integrated separately according to its own requirements. To maintain the interconnectivity and consolidation of the primary system, these subsystems must communicate with each other through the interface and transfer certain information at the end points of a defined time interval termed macro time step. Inside the macro time step, the evolution of the interface variables has to be approximated as information about them will only be available again at the end of the step. In real-time simulations, the size of the macro time step and the accuracy of the approximated interface variables are critical factors; if the interface variables are approximated accurately, the size of the macro time step can be kept large enough to provide interactive rates without loss of accuracy and stability. This work focuses on systems where unilateral contact interactions are important and proposes reduced interface model concepts for such non-smooth systems. The use of the proposed reduced interface model (RIM) is demonstrated in co-simulation to provide model-based approximation of the interface variables. The advantages of the proposed method are demonstrated through two representative case studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".