MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388874014 · doi:10.1115/detc2023-116406

Preliminary Development of a Robotic Hip-Knee Exoskeleton With 3D-Printed Backdrivable Actuators

2023· article· en· W4388874014 on OpenAlexaff
Alyssia Sanchez, Trent Rossos, Alex Mihailidis, Brokoslaw Laschowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExoskeletonActuatorModular designComputer sciencePowered exoskeletonRehabilitation roboticsWearable computerController (irrigation)RobotRoboticsSimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Robotic exoskeletons can provide powered locomotor assistance and rehabilitation to persons with mobility impairments due to aging and/or physical disabilities. Here we present the preliminary development and systems integration of T-BLUE — a modular, bilateral robotic hip-knee exoskeleton with 3D-printed backdriveable actuators. We retrofitted commercially available passive postoperative orthoses with open-source 3D-printed actuators to minimize cost and improve accessibility. The actuators are of quasi-direct drive design with high-torque density brushless DC motors and low gearing (15:1 transmission ratio) for low output impedance and high backdrivability, therein allowing for energy-efficient and dynamic human-robot physical interaction and legged locomotion. The modular design allows the exoskeleton to be customized and adapted to different users (e.g., persons with lateral vs. bilateral mobility impairments) and different hip-knee joint configurations. The goals of this preliminary study were to describe our experience with regards to the repeatability of the open-source 3D-printed actuators in engineering practice and the feasibility of integrating the actuators into wearable robotics hardware. This qualitative research serves as a first step towards using the robotic exoskeleton to support the development and testing of novel controller designs and rehabilitation protocols for different locomotor activities of daily living. We are especially interested in populations that could benefit from partial locomotor assistance such as older adults and/or persons with osteoarthritis. Future research will involve benchtop testing to quantitatively evaluate the actuator performance in terms of dynamics and energy-efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207