MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388878400 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2023.3335414

Multi-Objective Multi-Dimensional Resource Allocation for Categorized QoS Provisioning in Beyond 5G and 6G Radio Access Networks

2023· article· en· W4388878400 on OpenAlexafffund
Yongqin Fu, Xianbin Wang, Fang Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceBackhaul (telecommunications)Quality of serviceComputer networkProvisioningResource allocationRadio access networkOptimization problemDistributed computingMathematical optimizationBase stationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To effectively meet the diverse Quality of Service (QoS) requirements from proliferating applications, a widely-adopted practical solution in radio access network (RAN) is categorized QoS provisioning, which utilizes virtual networks (i.e., tenants) to support a limited number of service categories. Apparently, one critical issue is RAN resource allocation among coexisting tenants. However, conventional single objective-based approaches cannot ensure fairness among different service categories. Moreover, except for radio resource, computing and storage resources also need to be considered. Besides, appropriate allocation of computing and storage resources could help mitigating backhaul network congestion. Hence, we aim to optimize the key QoS indicators of three main service categories and reduce backhaul bandwidth consumption simultaneously. We formulate the problem of multi-dimensional resource allocation from RAN to tenants as a multi-objective mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) problem, which is challenging to solve directly due to the competing objectives and the mutual-influenced resources. For guaranteeing fairness, this problem is reformulated as a single-objective optimization problem using weighted sum approach. Moreover, a decoupling-based iterative optimization (DBIO) algorithm is proposed to decompose it into three subproblems to solve iteratively. Simulation results demonstrate that DBIO algorithm can achieve superior performance with much less time consumption, compared with three metaheuristic algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207