MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388878473 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2023.3324060

Sampled-Data Model-Free Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems

2023· article· en· W4388878473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)LinearizationComputer scienceSampling (signal processing)Nonlinear systemSampled data systemsAdaptive controlControl (management)Adaptation (eye)Control systemControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work aims at presenting a new sampled-data model-free adaptive control (SDMFAC) for continuous-time systems with the explicit use of sampling period and past input and output (I/O) data to enhance control performance. A sampled-data-based dynamical linearization model (SDDLM) is established to address the unknown nonlinearities and nonaffine structure of the continuous-time system, which all the complex uncertainties are compressed into a parameter gradient vector that is further estimated by designing a parameter updating law. By virtue of the SDDLM, we propose a new SDMFAC that not only can use both additional control information and sampling period information to improve control performance but also can restrain uncertainties by including a parameter adaptation mechanism. The proposed SDMFAC is data-driven and thus overcomes the problems caused by model-dependence as in the traditional control design methods. The simulation study is performed to demonstrate the validity of the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it