MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388901074 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348015

Cosmological parameters derived from the final <i>Planck</i> data release (PR4)

2023· article· en· W4388901074 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Tristram, A. J. Banday, M. Douspis, X. Garrido, K. M. Górski, S. Henrot–Versillé, L. T. Hergt, S. Ilić, Reijo Keskitalo, G. Lagache, C. R. Lawrence, Bruce Partridge, D. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean CommissionInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPlanckPhysicsTheoretical physicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present cosmological parameter constraints using maps from the last Planck data release (PR4). In particular, we detail an upgraded version of the cosmic microwave background likelihood, HiLLiPoP , that is based on angular power spectra and relies on a physical modeling of the foreground residuals in the spectral domain. This new version of the likelihood retains a larger sky fraction (up to 75%) and uses an extended multipole range. Using this likelihood, along with low- ℓ measurements from LoLLiPoP , we derived constraints on ΛCDM parameters that are in good agreement with previous Planck 2018 results, but with smaller uncertainties by 10% to 20%. We demonstrate that the foregrounds can be accurately described in the spectral domain, with a negligible impact on ΛCDM parameters. We also derived constraints on single-parameter extensions to ΛCDM, including A L , Ω K , N eff , and ∑ m ν . Noteworthy results from this updated analysis include a lensing amplitude value of A L = 1.039 ± 0.052, which is more closely aligned with theoretical expectations within the ΛCDM framework. Additionally, our curvature measurement, Ω K = −0.012 ± 0.010, is now fully consistent with a flat universe and our measurement of S 8 is closer to the measurements derived from large-scale structure surveys (at the 1.5 σ level). We also added constraints from PR4 lensing, making this combination the most tightly constrained data set currently available from Planck . Additionally, we explored the addition of baryon acoustic oscillation data, which tightens the limits on some particular extensions to the standard cosmology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations187
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207