ASPR-based Output Feedback Control with Virtual PFC for Output Tracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, the output feedback control method based on the Almost Strictly Positive Real (ASPR) property gets many attentions and has been researched widely. ASPR models can be stabilized by applying simple output feedback control; so the designed controllers have a simple structure. However, the systems have to satisfy quite strict conditions in order to obtain ASPR-ness, although almost all practical systems do not have the ASPR property. Therefore, for relaxing those conditions, the introduction of a Parallel Feedforward Compensator (PFC) has been proposed. This method can render the resulting augmented system ASPR. Up to now, several PFC design methods have been proposed, and one of them is an adaptive PFC design scheme. This technique has a feature that it can design a PFC automatically by utilizing online data. Furthermore, for the purpose of output regulation, the control design methods with an adaptive PFC have been proposed. Unfortunately, however, in almost all schemes, the discussion on the convergence of actual errors has not been conducted. Therefore, in this paper, introducing a virtual PFC model and an auxiliary input for ensuring ASPR-ness, a new ASPR-based output feedback control method is proposed, and the stability analysis and convergence of the actual error are discussed. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is confirmed via numerical simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".