PARTISIPATORI DESAIN BERKELANJUTAN PADA PERANCANGAN MUSHOLA AL-HIDAYAH RT.06 RW.05 KELURAHAN PENANGGUNGAN KOTA MALANG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mushola Al-Hidayah merupakan salah satu fasilitas peribadatan yang ada di permukiman RT.06 RW.05 Kelurahan Penanggungan. Keberadaan mushola tersebut sangat dibutuhkan dan belum selesai pembangunannya. Pendampingan ini merupakan keberlanjutan dari program kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat tahun kemarin yaitu mengembangkan pra rancangan mushola dengan program kegiatan pendampingan pengembangan desain muhola Al Hidayah RT.6 RW. 5 Kelurahan Penanggungan Klojen Kota Malang. Pendampingan tersebut bekerjasama antara tim panitia pembangunan mushola, RT.06 dengan tim pengusul untuk mewujudkan desain pengembangan yang lengkap agar pekerjaan di lapangan nantinya lebih jelas dan terarah. Dalam pengembangan desain ini tahapan yang dilakukan adalah dengan mendetailkan rancangan pekerjaan, sistem konstruksi dan struktur bangunan, mekanikal elektrikal dan juga penggunaan material pada bangunan. Hasil dari pengembangan desain ini berupa gambar kerja atau DED (Detail Engineering Drawing), yang nantinya dapat menjelaskan proses pelaksanaan dan pengawasan konstruksi yang akan dilakukan di lapangan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.103 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".