Manajemen Sarana Dan Prasarana Pendidikan Di Sekolah Unggulan SD Bintang Madani
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memastikan betapa pentingnya manajemen sarana dan prasarana untuk meningkatkan standar belajar siswa. Dengan pendekatan berbasis perpustakaan, penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi kualitatif. Temuan menunjukkan betapa pentingnya manajemen infrastruktur untuk meningkatkan standar pengajaran dan pembelajaran siswa di SD Bintang Madani. 1) Perencaan sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani dilakukan melalui kegiatan rapat. 2) Pengadaan sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani dilakukan sesuai hasil pengawasan terhadap sarana dan prasana yang sudah ada. 3) Iventarisasi sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani dilakukan sesuai standar operasional prosedur yang sudah ditetapkan. 4) Pendistribusian sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani dilakukan sesuai peruntuk pada perencanaan sebelumnya. 5) Pemeliharaan sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani pihak sekolah telah menunjuk 9 orang tenaga kependidikan. 6) Penghapusan sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani dilakukan untuk sarana dan prasarana yang sudah tidak bias diperbaiki. 7) Pengawasan sarana dan prasarana di SD Bintang Madani dilakukan oleh pihak internal dan bekerjasa dengan pihak eksternal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".