Chance-Constrained Rollover-Free Manipulation Planning with Uncertain Payload Mass
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a chance-constrained rollover-free manipulation planning method for robotic arms under payload mass uncertainty. The corresponding motion planning problem is stated as a chance-constrained nonlinear optimal control problem (NOCP) subject to kinematics and rollover stability constraints. The latter takes the form of a chance constraint that ensures a certain probability of the robot maintaining dynamic rollover stability in the presence of payload mass uncertainty. To achieve efficient solutions to the NOCP, a novel geometric bound for the stability region is derived. The novel bound is then utilized to modify the rollover-stability constraint. To showcase its benefit, comparisons between the proposed bound of probabilistic rollover stability measure and the naive noise model are provided through statistical analysis. The formulation’s practicality is demonstrated through experiments with a Kinova Jaco 2 arm mounted on a free-to-roll platform. Results demonstrate greater robustness of the robot’s motion plan to mass uncertainty and computational efficiency of the trajectory generation.Â
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it