Environment-Aware Knowledge Distillation for Improved Resource-Constrained Edge Speech Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in self-supervised learning have allowed automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems to achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) word error rates (WER) while requiring only a fraction of the labeled data needed by its predecessors. Notwithstanding, while such models achieve SOTA results in matched train/test scenarios, their performance degrades substantially when tested in unseen conditions. To overcome this problem, strategies such as data augmentation and/or domain adaptation have been explored. Available models, however, are still too large to be considered for edge speech applications on resource-constrained devices; thus, model compression tools, such as knowledge distillation, are needed. In this paper, we propose three innovations on top of the existing DistilHuBERT distillation recipe: optimize the prediction heads, employ a targeted data augmentation method for different environmental scenarios, and employ a real-time environment estimator to choose between compressed models for inference. Experiments with the LibriSpeech dataset, corrupted with varying noise types and reverberation levels, show the proposed method outperforming several benchmark methods, both original and compressed, by as much as 48.4% and 89.2% in the word error reduction rate in extremely noisy and reverberant conditions, respectively, while reducing by 50% the number of parameters. Thus, the proposed method is well suited for resource-constrained edge speech recognition applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".