La recherche-création à l’université : cadrage sociohistorique d’une nouvelle forme de recherche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article propose un cadrage sociohistorique de la recherche-création (RC) au Québec suivant le modèle d’Yves Gingras (1991) portant sur l’institutionnalisation de la recherche en milieu universitaire. À partir notamment de documents d’archives et de données quantitatives du financement, l’article dégage trois temps du développement de cette forme de recherche, soit : l’émergence (fin des années 1960 aux années 1990), l’institutionnalisation (1990-2000) et la création d’une identité sociale et d’une communauté de chercheurs-créateurs (les années 2000 à aujourd’hui). L’article contribue à mettre en lumière pour chacune de ces périodes des points de changement (ex. foyers de chercheurs-créateurs, inscriptions de la RC dans les orientations institutionnelles, nouveaux programmes d’études, etc.) ainsi que des points de tension (ex. critères d’embauche, définition de la RC, reconnaissance des productions, etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".