Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Based on Random Forest Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a syndrome characterized by acquired cognitive impairment, leading to significant declines in daily life, learning, work, and social functioning. It has a profound impact on the lives of elderly people, making early detection and treatment of Alzheimer's disease an urgent issue. This paper collects relevant data from patients with Alzheimer's disease in a certain hospital, explores the data using histograms, density probability graphs, box plots, and correlation coefficient heat maps after preprocessing. Then it compares the performance of logistic regression classification models, random forest classification models, and REF-random forest models in predicting the accuracy of Alzheimer's disease categories. The results show that the REF-random forest model achieves the highest prediction accuracy. Finally, this paper uses the SMOTE algorithm to process the data and further improve the accuracy of the model. The optimized REF-random forest model has achieved outstanding results in all indicators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it