MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388926090 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a10

Chasing the Break: Tracing the Full Evolution of a Black Hole X-Ray Binary Jet with Multiwavelength Spectral Modeling

2024· article· en· W4388926090 on OpenAlexafffund
Constanza Echiburú-Trujillo, Alexandra J. Tetarenko, Daryl Haggard, T. D. Russell, K. I. I. Koljonen, Arash Bahramian, Jingyi Wang, Michael Bremer, Joe Bright, P. Casella, D. M. Russell, D. Altamirano, M. C. Baglio, T. Belloni, Chiara Ceccobello, S. Corbel, María Díaz Trigo, D. Maitra, Aldrin Gabuya, Elena Gallo, Sebastian Heinz, J. Homan, Erin Kara, Elmar Körding, Fraser Lewis, Matteo Lucchini, Sera Markoff, S. Migliari, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, Payaswini Saikia, Craig L. Sarazin, T. Shahbaz, G. R. Sivakoff, Roberto Soria, V. Testa, B. E. Tetarenko, V. Tudose

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of LethbridgeMcGill University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Institutes of Natural SciencesSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean Southern ObservatoryMax-Planck-GesellschaftTamkeenAcademia SinicaNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekSpace Telescope Science InstituteNew York University Abu DhabiMcGill UniversityCanada Research ChairsNuclear Safety and Security CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Astronomical Research Institute of ThailandNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsAccretion (finance)Black hole (networking)Jet (fluid)AstronomySpectral lineInflowOutflowRadio spectrumRadiative transferMechanicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Black hole (BH) X-ray binaries (XRBs) are ideal targets to study the connection between accretion inflow and jet outflow. Here we present quasi-simultaneous, multiwavelength observations of the Galactic BH system MAXI J1820+070, throughout its 2018–2019 outburst. Our data set includes coverage from the radio through X-ray bands from 17 different instruments/telescopes, and encompasses 19 epochs over a 7 month period, resulting in one of the most well-sampled multiwavelength data sets of a BH XRB outburst to date. With our data, we compile and model the broadband spectra of this source using a phenomenological model that includes emission from the jet, a companion star, and an accretion flow. This modeling allows us to track the evolution of the spectral break in the jet spectrum, a key observable that samples the jet launching region. We find that the spectral break location changes over at least ≈3 orders of magnitude in electromagnetic frequency over this period. Using these spectral break measurements, we link the full cycle of jet behavior, including the rising, quenching, and reignition, to the changing accretion flow properties as the source evolves through its different accretion states. Our analysis shows consistent jet behavior with other sources in similar phases of their outbursts, reinforcing the idea that jet quenching and recovery may be a global feature of BH XRB systems in outburst. Our results also provide valuable evidence supporting a close connection between the geometry of the inner accretion flow and the base of the jet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207