MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388927706 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12278

The Data Acquisition System for Phase-III of the BeEST Experiment

2023· preprint· en· W4388927706 on OpenAlexfundno aff
C. Bray, S. Fretwell, I. Kim, W. K. Warburton, F. Ponce, K. G. Leach, S. Friedrich, Ryan Abells, P. Amaro, Adrien Andoche, R. Cantor, David R. Diercks, Mauro Guerra, Angela Hall, Charles M. Harris, Jared D. Harris, L. Hayen, Paul-Antoine Hervieux, G. B. Kim, A. Lennarz, Vincenzo Lordi, Jorge Machado, P. Machule, A. D. Marino, David McKeen, X. Mougeot, C. Ruiz, Amit Samanta, J. P. Santos, Caitlyn Stone-Whitehead

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Metrology Programme for Innovation and ResearchPacific Northwest National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsTRIUMF
KeywordsData acquisitionPixelDetectorPhase (matter)Computer scienceSampling (signal processing)Limit (mathematics)Computer hardwareMode (computer interface)Pulse (music)PhysicsElectronic engineeringOpticsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The BeEST experiment is a precision laboratory search for physics beyond the standard model that measures the electron capture decay of $^7$Be implanted into superconducting tunnel junction (STJ) detectors. For Phase-III of the experiment, we constructed a continuously sampling data acquisition system to extract pulse shape and timing information from 16 STJ pixels offline. Four additional pixels are read out with a fast list-mode digitizer, and one with a nuclear MCA already used in the earlier limit-setting phases of the experiment. We present the performance of the data acquisition system and discuss the relative advantages of the different digitizers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207