MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388931399 · doi:10.1002/csc2.21152

Increasing diversity among <i>Lens</i> species for improving biological nitrogen fixation in lentil

2023· article· en· W4388931399 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Vargas, Linda Yuya Gorim, Kirstin E. Bett

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCultivarNitrogen fixationGermplasmInoculationGenetic diversityAgronomyRhizobiumHorticultureBotanyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Exotic germplasm is a key resource for reintroducing genetic variability into cultivars. We evaluated 36 accessions from cultivated lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.) and six related wild species inoculated with a commercial strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae under greenhouse conditions. The objective was to explore Lens species and/or accessions that can contribute higher biological nitrogen fixation ability to the lentil crop. A split plot design was used with either Rhizobium inoculation, added nitrogen (+N), or neither as the main plots, and accessions in subplots randomized in blocks. Two repeats of the experiment were evaluated at flowering for N fixation and nodulation characters, and two subsequent experiments, with a subset of 14 accessions, were evaluated at maturity for seed production, seed quality, and harvest index. Differences in phenotypic expression corresponded to specific accessions but not to any particular Lens species. CDC Greenstar had the highest N fixation among lentil cultivars and also had superior yield results compared to the added N treatment. When inoculated, wild accessions, including IG 72643 ( Lens orientalis ), displayed unique and multiple desirable characteristics compared to cultivars, including indeterminate nodulation, higher N translocation, stable yield compared to added N treatment, and exceptionally high protein concentration in seeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207