MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388942934 · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123007

Effect of industrialization on the differences in sources and composition of ambient PM2.5 in two Southern Ontario locations

2023· article· en· W4388942934 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mahmoud M. Yassine, Ewa Dąbek-Złotorzyńska, Valbona Celo, Uwayemi M. Sofowote, Dennis Mooibroek, Philip K. Hopke

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Pollution · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceParticulatesPollutantBiomass burningNitrateEnvironmental chemistryAerosolGeographyChemistryMeteorologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PM2.5 was sampled over a seven-year period (2013–2019) at two locations ∼50 km apart in Southern Ontario (concurrently for five years: 2015–2019). One is a heavily industrialized site (Hamilton), while the other was a rural site (Simcoe). To assess the impact of industrialization on the composition and sources of PM affecting air quality in these two locations, Positive matrix factorization coupled with dispersion normalization (DN-PMF) was used to identify six and eight factors at Simcoe and Hamilton, respectively. The Simcoe factors in order of diminishing PM mass contribution were: particulate sulphate (pSO4), secondary organic aerosol (SOA), crustal matter, particulate nitrate (pNO3), biomass burning, and vehicular emissions. At Hamilton, the effects of industrialization were observed by the ∼36% higher average ambient PM2.5 concentration for the study period as well as the presence of factors unique to metallurgy, i.e., coking and steelmaking, compared to Simcoe. The coking and steelmaking factors contributed ∼15% to the PM mass at Hamilton. Seasonal variants of appropriate nonparametric trend tests with the associated slopes (Sen's) were used to assess statistically significant changes in the factor contributions to PM2.5 over time. Specifically at Hamilton, a significant decline in PM contributions was noted for coking (−0.03 μg/m³/yr or −4.1%/yr) while steelmaking showed no statistically significant decline over the study period. Other factors at Hamilton that showed statistically significant declines over the study period were: pSO4 (−0.27 μg/m³/yr or −12.6%/yr), biomass burning (−0.05 μg/m³/yr or −9.02%/yr), crustal matter (−0.03 μg/m³/yr or −5.28%/yr). These factors mainly accounted for the significant decline in PM2.5 over the study period (−0.35 μg/m³/yr or −4.24%/yr). This work shows the importance of long-term monitoring in assessing the unique contributions and temporal changes of industrialization on air quality in similarly affected locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental PollutionSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207