MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388948083 · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127068

A hybrid methodology for anomaly detection in Cyber–Physical Systems

2023· article· en· W4388948083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurocomputing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsAnomaly detectionIntrusion detection systemComputer scienceSignature (topology)Cyber-physical systemAnomaly (physics)Anomaly-based intrusion detection systemNetwork securityData miningAttack surfaceArtificial intelligenceComputer securityMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid adoption of Industry 4.0 has seen Information Technology (IT) networks increasingly merged with Operational Technology (OT) networks, which have traditionally been isolated on air-gapped and fully trusted networks. This increased attack surface has resulted in compromises of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) with significant economic and life safety consequences. This paper proposes a hybrid model of anomaly detection of security threats to CPS by blending the signature-based and threshold-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) commonly used in IT networks, with a Machine Learning (ML) model designed to detect behaviour-based anomalies in OT networks. This hybrid model achieves more rapid detection of known threats through signature-based and threshold-based detection strategies, and more accurate detection of unknown threats via behaviour-based anomaly detection using ML algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it